So we say it in the manner we understand; the
words aren’t necessarily those we’d choose, if
we had a choice - but using others could likely
defuse common usage, and then we would be
accused; but we’re not falsifying truth we reply,
merely striving for accuracy, and that because
traditional terminology always has victims and
perpetrators who are supposed to be blamed
We couldn’t see anything such, just detrained
opportunity wasted by that analogous debate
on whose reputation had been sullied - unless
derailment was purely accidental & whomever
victimised rescinded by th’ case becoming as
said redundant in view of an arbitrary decision
Well, we were chastised for being too flippant
first place about whose mess it was, and then
castigated for making statements t’ the effect
th’ non-sequitur indicated they’d got it wrong
too - but that is all a thing of the past; now its
the ‘real-deal’ deciding what Being a Victim -
And The Role of a Perpetrator - really means
© 1 March 2018, I. D. Carswell
No comments:
Post a Comment